Judge Faith – Bus Driver’s Buyout; Lover’s Quarrel (Season 1: Episode #131)

, , 82 Comments

 

82 Responses

  1. Andrew King

    August 17, 2016 7:15 pm

    On the first case concerning the use car…. The plaintiff spent that money and did not pay the finance company. I truly believe she spent every single dime it had no intention of paying the financial company for the car that she was already behind 4 in payments. and to have her overweight mother come and lie for her in court is an horrible shame. this is just my opinion

    Reply
  2. Marcus A

    August 18, 2016 3:43 am

    First Case – The only reason the mother is there, is clearly to get on TV. But then not only did you not get the case won, but you end up having to pay at the end. Horrible.

    Second Case – Is this lady extra nervous or is something wrong with her? She won't keep still.

    Reply
  3. Jamie8787

    September 17, 2016 10:03 pm

    Second case, i'm sorry to say but that lady looks like she on some sort of narcotic. But I am sorry about her ex leaving her in such a disrespectful manner.

    Reply
  4. Shelia Pea

    May 22, 2017 2:41 am

    She ain't got to be high on nothing. She hurt been done an injustice and nervous on television. She could hv allergies or a cold..some of y'all think the worst. Give ppl the benefit of the doubt. Stop jumping to conclusions. She hurt.

    Reply
  5. Reem Sakhnini

    June 1, 2017 10:28 pm

    i wonder if this is like judge judy where the show pays what is owed or do the people actually have to pay out of their own pocket??

    Reply
  6. Merna Frederick

    July 1, 2017 5:33 am

    Need to fire this bailiff and bring back Juan. This is at least the 2nd video in which she said, :The Honorable Faith JACOBS…." Her name is 'Jenkins.'

    Reply
  7. Cidalia Perez

    July 1, 2017 10:41 pm

    Second case- what an A**hole. The truck was $6,000., Tony only put $800 n sold it for $3,700. So he basically said screw her, he made a profit from his $800. I would of made him pay her the $5,200 (at least the money she had put in) or extra. Tham this is to show that can't trust people not even an ex-significant-other.

    Reply
  8. Shania Shanea

    July 11, 2017 5:28 am

    y everyone keep talking bout drugs
    the lady doesn't seem like she on drugs
    she looks sad and like she's about to cry
    and really trying hard not
    I get it's y'all opinions but look again
    she just looks nervous and extremely sad

    Reply
  9. MrsJ 972

    June 5, 2018 4:16 pm

    HOW many times can the word "truck" be said???…. I feel bad for her, she loves him and he Don t care.

    Reply
  10. Snook Snook

    June 8, 2018 9:51 am

    Both cases seemed to have fair verdict. The 2nd case – the lady seemed like she was on cocaine.

    Reply
  11. Mary Smith

    June 12, 2018 4:34 am

    Boy, on that second case the woman was wigging out on drugs! He probably had to get away from her to go to rehab!

    Reply
  12. Nia Marie

    June 22, 2018 1:40 pm

    The 2nd case, I don't think she is on drugs, I think she is hurt, not only did he took the tuck, and made a profit from it and disappeared, but she has to take him to court, so I think she is heart broken๐Ÿ’”
    I don't think he loved her, he loved her money, obviously she was the bread winner of the relationship..so sad๐Ÿ˜”

    Reply
  13. Cynthia C.

    June 24, 2018 11:17 pm

    2nd case: 18:13 Plaintiff: "This is not easy an easy thing to do." Are you kidding me, lady? The guy's a total dick! Delete him from your life! (She was renting cars the whole time? I think she was in the red on all these buying and selling deals but hasn't figured it out yet.)

    Reply
  14. MIA MINI

    June 30, 2018 3:17 pm

    First case all that trouble to get a car might as well went to a used car dealership and get her one. second case what a dirty dog using her like that she seems nervous and hurt he didn't care he wanted money what a piece of shit

    Reply
  15. ToniA5555

    July 31, 2018 1:50 am

    It always amuses me when the person suing ends up having to pay. Some people are so stupid.

    Reply
  16. AMARIs Bella

    August 22, 2018 8:55 pm

    THE SECOND CASE… THE LADY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE OTHER DOLLARS SHE LOST.. BY HIM SELLING THE TRUCK FOR SO CHEAP.. HIS ASS DIDN'T DESERVE A DIME FOR THE SLICK SHIT HE DID… HE SHOULD'VE TOOK A TOTALLY LOST.. HIS 800 INCLUDED..

    CLEARLY THESE TWO HAVE DEEPER SEEDED ISSUE.. SHE LOOKS LIKE A ADDICT AND HE LOOKS LIKE THE RELATIONSHIP JUST WORE HIM OUT.. AND HE WALKED AWAY.. BUT HE DID IT IN THE WRONG WAY..

    Reply
  17. Faith Sincere

    October 11, 2018 12:18 pm

    Faith messed up on that second case. He should have had to pay her the full $3700. Why would she allow him to get his money back when he forced her to take a loss ??

    Reply
  18. michael crandle

    October 29, 2018 12:47 pm

    First case woman is a dummy how you going to say that the tires were slashed but now say there is a hole in them

    Reply
  19. puma lyn

    November 2, 2018 2:09 pm

    Why must people be ashamed of their God given hair and waste money on wigs, implants etc. That's so fake and ugly! If they can't accept themselves for who they are, how can they except others too?!๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ’ฉ

    Reply
  20. annie johnson

    January 19, 2019 9:42 am

    For someone who is so called on drugs from ur comments she sure has allot of money to spare on these cars when half of yโ€™all
    Probably canโ€™t even get a Big Mac ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿพโ€โ™€๏ธ Stop assuming she was hurt holding back allot of emotions I can clearly see

    Reply
  21. Heather Gabriel

    May 24, 2019 1:44 am

    2nd case.that guy is a dirtbag!should have given the plantiff a $5000 settlement.he probably sold the truck for more…but coming to court he knew the outcome,so he told the judge he sold it for less.and the defendant should move on..he clearly is not interested and for whatever reason doesnt seem to care about her anymore.

    Reply
  22. Michael Bar-Dov

    June 25, 2019 5:25 pm

    If the claimant paid ยง5,000 for the truck which the defendant sold without her agreement, and if he only paid ยง800 for it, why should she not get all her money back? The fact that he sold it for only ยง3,700 is his problem.
    What would the judge have decided if he gave the truck away? Would she then have awarded the plaintiff nothing?

    Reply
  23. Athena

    August 1, 2019 4:10 am

    Iโ€™m confused on the second case. I think she should have subtracted the 800 from how much the truck cost. It how much they sold it for. Bc he never had permission to sell it. Itโ€™s not her problem that he sold it for less. Now sheโ€™s lost money bc of him.

    Reply
  24. Razik Ridzuan

    August 9, 2019 3:30 pm

    For second case, is the calculation fair.. Shouldnt it be 5200/(5200+800) times with 3700, which equates to around 3200? What if the truck is sold below 800? How would you calculate it then?

    Reply
  25. Carolyn Green

    September 3, 2019 10:37 pm

    OMG…..Ms Ladie on the left behind the plaintiff….suuuuuuuper haircrush ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜!!!!

    Reply
  26. Tina Goodwyn

    September 19, 2019 11:32 pm

    Y do we as black women have to have some dead persons hair on our head? No self esteem….my daughter would be happy in her own if I had one…I have two sons…geez

    Reply
  27. Faye Barnes

    September 28, 2019 6:27 am

    JF u were wrong on that verdict. He should not have gotten any money on that deal. He should have had to pay her at least the amount she put into it. U allowed him to get all of his money back and allowed her to get shaft. How is that right?

    Reply
  28. Skylar Jaxx

    October 15, 2019 2:45 am

    Second case I disagree she should have gotten all her money back I doubt she would have sold that truck for a loss.

    Reply
  29. N Makarova

    October 19, 2019 6:28 am

    Anyone else think the wife in the 2nd case looks like actress Eddie Falco? https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&source=hp&ei=76yqXbS5J8vUtQXDmZK4DQ&q=edith+falco&oq=edith+falco&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-img.3…1575.5584..6322…0.0..0.65.616.11……0….1…….0..0i131j0.rpIA4Kp6piQ

    Reply
  30. SDD41

    November 14, 2019 11:55 pm

    A terrible decision in the second case. The guy put in $800 in the truck and she paid in over $4,500. She awarded him all of $800 and let eat the loss in full. In fact, he was the thug who sold the truck for $3,700 and walked away with it. How does this square? He iends up losing nothing, she eats the entire loss. A stupid decision from an incompetent judge.

    Reply
  31. Shawnzay Hale

    November 26, 2019 9:27 pm

    She clearly trying to keep from crying she loves him n he did her dirty n cant even apologized he has no remorse he coldhearted n the 1st mom definitely look younger n definitely just wanted her 5secs of tv fame lol smh

    Reply
  32. Abilene Reese

    December 11, 2019 9:53 pm

    I also agree that on that second case Judge Faith SHOULD have given the lady her full 5200! I dont believe that he sold that truck for 3700! He probably put that on the bill of sale so that Taxes were lower (bought a cash car and the guy did that). I usually agree with the judge but not this time!

    Reply
  33. Moneymaker3602

    December 22, 2019 9:03 pm

    You made a bad decision in this case how did u order him to pay 2 gran when the lady pay 5200 n he sold it for 3700 that was a real bad stupid decision you shud of given her 9,100 the lady lost alot of money here first he stold the truck which she paid 5200 so shes to make profit not lose n he sold it for3700 so you add 5200+3700=9900-800 he put wow you made a bad decision judge

    Reply
  34. puma lyn

    December 24, 2019 12:23 pm

    We HUNG GOUT?!๐Ÿค” It's HUNG OUT!๐Ÿ™„ I AKSED/AXED?!๐Ÿค” It's ASKED!๐Ÿ™„ The car was on a flat?!We love you JF!๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚ Now we know what GHETTO means!๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚

    Reply
  35. puma lyn

    December 24, 2019 2:14 pm

    13:53 The plaintiff looks and acts like a disgusting drug addict!๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคฎ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿฉ 18:38 I just left to take care of my health.. They were obviously doing drugs together and he wanted out! He looks clean while she's ๐Ÿคฎ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฎ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฎ

    Reply

Leave a Reply